tai va ka ir pagalvojau kad gali suplaukiot parametrai ant dideliu galiu ir sudegint garsiakalbi jei jis paleistas nelabai toli jo Fs ribos
tai va ka ir pagalvojau kad gali suplaukiot parametrai ant dideliu galiu ir sudegint garsiakalbi jei jis paleistas nelabai toli jo Fs ribos
Tai kalba eina apie labai dideles galias.Tada tik gal kas gali ir atsitikti, o normaliai tai kalba eina tai kad susjungimas nepajudėtų ir nepabėgtų sujungimo dažnis.
+370 686 40304, www.wix.com/arturass/wwwarthur-s-page
ant tiek smarkiai kondikų parametrai nuo garso tikrai neplaukioja,jei arti fs piščialkos pjovimas tai reikia 18db filtrą naudot ,arba notch filtrą
http://www.diyaudioandvideo.com/Calc...otch/Help.aspx
nepatinka man filtrai daugiau nei 6db
gal kam bus įdomu apie kondensatorių lyginimą, testus
http://tech.juaneda.com/en/articles/...apacitors.html
http://highend.projektas.lt/?tipstricks/6
http://highend.projektas.lt/?tipstricks/7
http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html
Pirmosios nuorodos testas iš dalies prieštarauja rolando (2,3 pozicija) testams.Elna silmic pirmame teste nugalėtojas,o 2 ir 3 testuose gauna ir nuo panasonic fc.Iš patirties galiu pasakyti visi jie neblogi (silmic,fc,bg,nichicon fg...),bet reikia žiūrėt konkrečią situaciją.Vienur reikia tokių,kitur tokių...tik bandymais išsirinksi sau tinkamiausią.Kas liečia kainą/kokybę ,FC panasonic yra nenugalimi.ZL rubycon skaitmenoje naudočiau...Elnos geri yra cerafine series,signalo kelyje ir ne tik.
4 Testas (kolonėlių filtrai),apibendrinant - geriausi kaina/kokybė yra obbligato premium (mkp),kaina panaši kaip audyn plus,bet tikrai geriau groja.Norint švelnesnio,lempiškesnio garso obbligato film oil (juodos bačkutės).Toliau kaina kyla drastiškai,o kokybė...gal ir išgirstum skirtumą,bet dar klausimasturiu omenyje mundorf supreme silver gold,bei Duelund CAST-Cu Copper.Nebrangus variantas dar yra wima mkp10 (nesumaišyti tik su mks4,tie prasti visai garsui).
įdomus aprašymas apie kondesatorius
WHICH AUDIO CAPACITOR?
Which capacitor to use is difficult to determine without actually trying. It depends on too many factors. To hear the potential of a certain part, it's often nessecary to change other parts too. Experimenting with different combinations is a more solid way to lift a design to a higher level. In principle the original music signal has to be preserved as much as possible, but it's difficult to tell which parts do. For analysing a music signal (harmonic structures changing in time), our ears are still the most useful instrument. But we're all calibrated differently. To some a SILMIC adds color and warmth and a Black Gate FK sounds neutral. To others a SILMIC sounds neutral because it exactly reproduces natural colors and warmth from the recording, a Black Gate FK sounds more 'hifi' to them, making the signal more pulsed, peaky (giving attack) and too clean (filtering out natural timbres). Often a combination of different (high quality) capacitors in the right places gives the best result. Best thing is to try yourself and trust your ears. Still, we want to mention some general characteristics as a rough guideline (of course these are our personal, biased, subjective experiences). These characters apply for capacitors used either in the signal path or in the power supply (for digital different rules apply, but there are simularities as well). Lower voltage versions of a capacitor can offer more refinement (it's faster, gives more presence towards the mid-highs).
The SILMIC II is best for reproducing different timbres, natural colors and warmth in a recording. It offers most presence in the low-mid range with lots of texture (tangible). Bass is round and warm, the mid and highrange are very refined, 'silky', quiet, but with lots of openess (more open than CERAFINE, less open than Black Gate FK).
The CERAFINE is also very good for reproducing different timbres, natural colors, but has a more direct sound than SILMIC (less direct than Black Gate FK). Bass is round and warm, the midrange has most presence and the high range is lively.
The Black Gate FK has the most open and clean sound, with the main presence in the high range. It sounds thinner, offers somewhat less texture and timbre. It offers most pulse, attack in both the low, mid and high ranges.
Bookmarks